Citizen-Soldiers, Citizen-Workers: Designing Education for America’s Dual-Service Workforce – DTU Research Paper | Workforce Design & Civic Infrastructure | 2026

by

The rhythm of the American labor market is increasingly defined by a segment of the workforce that exists in a perpetual state of transition. Imagine a scenario in 2026: a young professional in Kentucky spends her Monday through Friday managing logistics for a mid-sized medical supply firm, ensuring that life-saving equipment reaches rural clinics. She is also a student, finishing a degree in systems engineering during her late-night hours. However, when a Friday afternoon brings a notification of a state emergency activation due to severe weather, her world shifts instantly. By Saturday morning, she is no longer a civilian manager or a student; she is a Sergeant in the National Guard, leading a team through floodwaters to conduct search-and-rescue operations. This is the reality of the “citizen-soldier”—a dual-career professional who must balance the competing demands of military duty, civilian employment, and higher education.

The concept of the dual-service workforce is not a peripheral human resources issue; it is a central design challenge for the American economy. As of March 2025, the U.S. military encompasses approximately 2.86 million people, with nearly 765,495 serving in the National Guard and Reserve components.1 These individuals are not isolated in military bases; they are the managers, technicians, and entrepreneurs fueling local economies. Yet, the systems designed to support them—traditional higher education and corporate HR structures—often treat their service as an inconvenient exception rather than a strategic asset. Di Tran University studies how disciplined systems—like the Guard & Reserve—produce real outcomes, and how education and employers can learn from them to strengthen America’s workforce.

To address this misalignment, we must move beyond mere legal compliance toward a systemic “readiness” mentality. This transition requires a fundamental redesign of education models—moving from rigid “seat-time” requirements to flexible, outcome-based learning—and an evolution in employer culture that recognizes military discipline as a workforce accelerant. The following analysis explores the mechanisms of this dual-service reality, the structural failures of current systems, and the design principles necessary to build a workforce infrastructure that honors and utilizes the unique strengths of the citizen-soldier.

Who Is the Citizen-Soldier Worker?

The citizen-soldier is defined by their participation in the Reserve Components (RC), which include the Army National Guard, the Air National Guard, and the Reserve branches of the Army, Navy, Air Force, Marine Corps, and Coast Guard.1 Unlike active-duty service members, these individuals live primarily in the civilian world, maintaining full-time careers or pursuing education while standing ready for rapid mobilization. This integration makes them a “workforce multiplier,” bringing high-level technical skills and disciplined leadership into the civilian sector.

Demographics and Economic Integration

Data from 2024 and early 2025 reveals a veteran and service-member population that is economically resilient but facing unique hurdles. The unemployment rate for veterans has consistently remained lower than that of nonveterans, sitting at 3.0% in 2024 compared to 3.9% for the general population.2 However, this aggregate success masks the friction points encountered by those currently serving in the Guard and Reserve.

Workforce Indicator (2024)Veteran / Service MemberNonveteran
Overall Unemployment Rate3.0% 23.9% 2
Male Unemployment Rate2.9% 24.1% 2
Female Unemployment Rate3.5% 23.8% 2
Gulf War-era II Unemployment3.2% 2N/A

The high concentration of veterans in certain sectors underscores their value. For instance, Gulf War-era II veteran men are more than twice as likely to work in the public sector as nonveterans—25.9% compared to 10.2%.2 This preference for public service often reflects the alignment between military values and public sector missions. However, the private sector, particularly professional, scientific, and technical services, remains the primary frontier for Guard and Reserve talent.3

The Skills Translation Gap

While service members possess advanced training in logistics, cybersecurity, healthcare, and engineering, a significant “translation gap” persists between military experience and civilian job requirements. Research suggests that while 64% of veterans believe they are effective communicators, only 19% of civilian employers agree.5 Furthermore, 62% of employers believe veterans require additional education or training before being qualified for non-military roles.5

This disconnect is an artifact of poor system design. Military occupations, such as operational intelligence or drone operation, yield high earnings in the civilian market.4 Yet, traditional hiring processes often fail to recognize the “intangible attributes” that service produces: adaptability, mission orientation, and extreme discipline.5

Military Occupation (MOC)Civilian CounterpartMedian Annual Wage (2023)
Data Scientist (Air/Space Force)Data Scientist$108,020 7
Information Security (Coast Guard)Information Security Analyst$120,360 7
Nurse Practitioner (Army)Nurse Practitioner$126,260 7
Logistician (Army)Logistician$79,400 7

The pilot study by the Department of Labor (DOL) found that the number of civilian matches for military roles could be increased from 1.5 to 14 per occupation by analyzing “embedded skill sets” rather than just job titles.8 This suggests that the dual-service workforce is the most underutilized accelerant in the American economy, provided we build the infrastructure to translate their skills effectively.

The Dual-Service Reality: One Life, Two Systems

The operational tempo of the National Guard and Reserve has reached a fever pitch. In 2025, military-related absences from the civilian workforce surged to their highest levels in nearly two decades.9 This is driven by a shift in how the Guard is used—no longer just a strategic reserve for large-scale wars, but an operational force for domestic emergencies, border security, and global rotations.

The Balancing Act: Work, Service, and School

For the individual service member, this increased demand creates a “friction point” of competing priorities. The traditional commitment of “one weekend a month, two weeks a year” has evolved into a more complex cycle of pre-deployment training, state-mandated activations, and federal mobilizations.9

  • Scheduling Uncertainty: While federal law requires advance notice for service, the duration of an activation can be unpredictable, particularly in disaster response.11
  • Operational Strain: Small businesses and tight-knit teams often struggle to reallocate the workload of an absent member, leading to “burnout” both for the service member trying to catch up and for the coworkers covering their shifts.11
  • Promotion Risk: Despite legal protections under USERRA, service members report missing promotion opportunities and experiencing subtle workplace bias because of their “unavailability”.12

The Family-System Issue

Service in the Guard and Reserve is inherently a family endeavor. Research highlights that 43% of out-of-town reservists report their families have “zero support” from military resources when they are away, relying entirely on local networks.13 Furthermore, a significant portion of Guard/Reserve members are caregivers for aging parents or grandparents.13

When a service member is activated, the family unit must absorb the loss of income, child care, and emotional stability. Workplace designs that fail to account for the family system—such as rigid scheduling or lack of family leave—increase the likelihood that the service member will “stop out” of their civilian career or their education.13

When Education Fails the Dual-Service Student

American higher education is largely predicated on the “seat-time” model, where credit is awarded based on the number of hours a student spends in a classroom. For the dual-service student, this model is a structural barrier to success.

The Problem with Semester-Bound Learning

The mismatch between military schedules and academic calendars is profound. A 15-week semester is unforgiving to a student who is mobilized for three weeks in October.

  1. Inflexible Pacing: Most traditional colleges do not allow students to “pause” and “resume” their coursework. If a student misses a critical window, they are often forced to withdraw, losing tuition and delaying graduation.14
  2. Benefit Hurdles: Federal Tuition Assistance (TA) and GI Bill® benefits require complex approval processes for specific academic programs. Delays in these disbursements—reported increasingly in 2025—can force students to stop out of school due to lack of funds.14
  3. Redundant Learning: Many service members enter college already possessing the skills taught in the curriculum. Forcing a seasoned combat medic to sit through a basic First Aid course is not only a waste of time but a psychological deterrent to persistence.15

Military-connected learners, who comprise about 5% of all undergraduates, require systems designed for “persistence through disruption”.14 Current institutional policies often view the student’s service as a “hardship” rather than a valid, and often superior, form of experiential learning.

The Failure to Recognize Prior Learning

Colleges frequently fail to transfer military credit effectively because they lack the “crosswalks” to translate military training into course equivalencies.15 A service member may have mastered advanced technical skills through years of “on-the-job” experience in a squadron, but if those skills were not formally documented in a traditional academic format, the college misses the mark.15 This results in a loss of institutional efficiency and a longer, more expensive path to a degree for the veteran.

The Military’s Outcome-Based Model (and What Academia Can Learn)

The U.S. military has pioneered a learning framework that civilian education would do well to emulate: Outcome-Based Training and Education (OBT&E). This model focuses on developing “thinking, adaptive warriors” who can solve problems in uncertain environments.6 Di Tran University studies how disciplined systems—like the Guard & Reserve—produce real outcomes, and how education and employers can learn from them to strengthen America’s workforce.

The Mechanics of OBT&E

OBT&E shifts the burden of learning from the instructor’s lecture to the student’s performance.

  • Mastery over Time: Progression is based on achieving a standard, not sitting in a chair. A soldier advances when they demonstrate proficiency in a task, conditions, and standards.6
  • The Experiential Learning Model (ELM): Learning occurs through a cycle of Concrete Experience (doing), Reflective Observation (thinking), Abstract Conceptualization (concluding), and Active Experimentation (applying).17
  • Tactical Decision Exercises (TDEs): Students are placed in ambiguous, high-pressure scenarios where they must make decisions with limited information and then defend their logic.18

This model produces individuals who are “physically fit and mentally tough,” with a high degree of “moral courage” and “self-confidence”.18 These are exactly the traits civilian employers claim they cannot find in the traditional workforce.

Case Study: Louisville Beauty Academy (LBA)

Louisville Beauty Academy serves as a civilian laboratory for these military-inspired, outcome-based principles. As a micro-employer and vocational school under the Di Tran University umbrella, LBA has redefined trade education by moving away from traditional “hours-based” bureaucracy toward a “Gold-Standard” model.19

LBA emphasizes:

  • Gold-Standard Over-Compliance: Utilizing biometric time tracking and digital documentation to provide “public proof” of skill.21
  • The Zero Disruption Policy: Maintaining an environment of “Love and Care” through strict discipline. LBA argues that true care requires the removal of toxicity—gossip, drama, and bullying—mirroring the military’s “good order and discipline”.19
  • Direct-to-Workforce Pathways: By focusing on licensure and employment outcomes rather than federal loan eligibility, LBA empowers students to enter the workforce debt-free and ready for entrepreneurial success.23

LBA functions not just as a school but as a “public knowledge library,” making its research on regulation and sanitation openly accessible to elevate the entire industry.20 This mirrors the military’s use of “Field Manuals” and shared tactical knowledge to ensure organizational resilience.

Small Employers: The Unseen Backbone of Guard Employment

While Fortune 500 companies often have the resources to build robust veteran programs, the reality of Guard and Reserve employment is firmly rooted in small and mid-sized businesses (SMBs). Small businesses employ 45.9% of all U.S. employees and were responsible for nearly 89% of net job creation in 2024.3

The Disproportionate Impact of Activations

Research from the Small Business Administration (SBA) and RAND Corporation shows that activations hit small firms much harder than large ones.

  • The Marginal Impact: In a small firm, adding one more employee increases the “percent activated” by 2.6%, compared to a negligible 0.05% in large firms.24
  • Economic Sensitivity: A 30-day activation results in a 1.9% decrease in sales for small firms relative to larger ones; this drops to a 3.0% decrease for activations exceeding 180 days.24

Small businesses often operate with “thin staffing,” meaning there is no redundancy when a key employee is called to service. This makes the “friction points” of insufficient notice and lack of communication with the DoD particularly acute for the small employer.11

The Strategic Advantage of Small Schools and Firms

Despite these constraints, small vocational schools like LBA and micro-employers are strategically important because they can pivot faster than large bureaucracies. They offer “flexible, student-driven” pathways that better accommodate the erratic schedules of the dual-service workforce.23 Small businesses also tend to have “close-knit, values-driven” cultures where the employer views the service member’s military duty as a shared civic responsibility.11

From Compliance to Readiness: A New Employer Mindset

The legal baseline for supporting the dual-service workforce is the Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act (USERRA). USERRA prohibits discrimination based on military service and guarantees that returning service members are reinstated with the same “seniority, status, and pay” they would have attained if they had never left—the “escalator principle”.26

Compliance Mentality vs. Readiness Mentality

A “compliance mentality” focuses on the minimum legal requirements: granting unpaid leave and avoiding lawsuits. In contrast, a “readiness mentality” views the service member as a strategic asset for the company’s resilience and leadership pipeline.

  • USERRA (Compliance): Mandatory restoration of job and benefits; 24-month health insurance continuation; five-year cumulative limit on service absences.26
  • ESGR Freedom Award (Readiness): Exceptional support including differential pay (covering the gap between military and civilian salary), flexible scheduling, lawn care for families of deployed members, and proactive outreach to the service member during deployment.30
Employer MindsetFocusTypical Practices
ComplianceRisk MitigationUnpaid leave, job reinstatement, health insurance continuation.26
ReadinessValue OptimizationDifferential pay, family support, Military Resource Groups (MRGs), MRG mentoring.30

Freedom Award winners, such as GE Aerospace, GM Financial, and Kimberly-Clark Corporation, demonstrate that “employer support is just as important today as it was 50 years ago”.32 These companies recognize that the “unfaltering support” they provide allows service members to focus on their mission, knowing their families and careers are secure.33

Best Practices of High-Performing Employers

The most supportive employers move beyond HR policy into the realm of community and culture building.

  • Financial Bridges: Companies like GM Financial have enhanced benefits to ensure service members suffer no negative financial impact, providing 100% differential pay and maintaining retirement matching funds.30
  • Family Outreach: Supportive firms organize “deployment and return parties” and provide practical aid—lawn care, snow removal, or grocery delivery—to families of the deployed.30
  • Internal Visibility: Using multimedia “picture boards” and internal announcements to highlight serving employees ensures the entire organization understands the value of their colleague’s service.30

Design Principles for “Dual-Service-Ready” Education and Workplaces

To move America’s workforce forward, education institutions and employers must intentionally design for the dual-service reality. We propose a framework based on the following seven design principles, grounded in empirical research and the disciplined models of the National Guard and Reserve.

1. Flexible, Modular, Outcome-Based Education (OBE)

Institutions must abandon the “seat-time” requirement in favor of modular learning. This allows students to complete discrete competencies on their own schedule. Capella University’s “FlexPath” model, which uses direct assessment to allow students to move quickly through material they have already mastered, serves as a successful pilot for this approach.15

  • Mechanism: Curriculum is broken into “micro-credentials” that can be paused and resumed without penalty during mobilizations.

2. Credential Portability and License Reciprocity

Service members and their spouses frequently relocate due to military orders. In 2025, the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act (SCRA) was updated to ensure that professional licenses—including law, nursing, and counseling—are valid across state lines for the duration of military orders.36

  • Mechanism: States should adopt “Interstate Licensure Compacts” to ensure that a dual-service worker’s qualifications move with them, preventing “career restarts”.36

3. Digital Documentation and Public Proof of Skill

The dual-service worker needs a way to communicate their skills to civilian employers that transcends a cryptic military transcript. The use of verified digital badges (e.g., Credly) allows service members to showcase specific learning outcomes, such as cybersecurity certifications or leadership training, in a format that is easily verified by LinkedIn and recruiters.39

  • Mechanism: Transition military training records into a “Digital Skills Portfolio” that maps directly to civilian job codes.

4. Strategic Differential Pay and Benefit Continuity

To maintain a “readiness” culture, employers should implement differential pay as a standard benefit. This eliminates the “financial penalty” of serving.

  • Mechanism: Corporate policy should automatically trigger a salary bridge when an employee is activated, ensuring the family’s mortgage and tuition payments are unaffected.30

5. Family-Aware Workplace Design

Workplaces must recognize that Guard/Reserve service is a family-system issue. This means providing “flexible, predictable scheduling” that accounts for drill weekends and reintegration periods after deployments.10

  • Mechanism: Employers should offer “Reintegration Leave” with pay, allowing the service member and their family time to readjust before returning to the civilian workplace.30

6. Employer-to-Military Communication Channels

The current system places the entire burden of communication on the service member. DoD research suggests the need for “information navigators” or portals where employers can get direct answers about an employee’s activation status without compromising operational security.11

  • Mechanism: Establish local “Employer-Unit Liaison” programs to facilitate clear timelines and expectations for activations.

7. Over-Compliance and Transparency in Vocational Training

Small vocational institutions should adopt the “Gold-Standard” framework used by Louisville Beauty Academy. By emphasizing “high-stakes documentation” and “professional chain of command,” these schools mirror the discipline of military environments, producing graduates who are not just licensed, but workforce-ready.19

  • Mechanism: Use biometric and digital tracking to create an “unassailable record” of student hours and competencies, reducing regulatory friction.

Conclusion: Designing for the Future of Work

The American dual-service workforce represents a unique reservoir of discipline, technical skill, and leadership. However, our ability to capitalize on this “workforce accelerant” depends on our willingness to redesign our systems. We cannot continue to treat National Guard and Reserve service as an HR exception or a “hardship” in higher education. Instead, we must recognize that the citizen-soldier is the model for the future of work: an adaptable, lifelong learner who serves their community while driving economic growth.

Di Tran University studies how disciplined systems—like the Guard & Reserve—produce real outcomes, and how education and employers can learn from them to strengthen America’s workforce. The evidence is clear: when we move from a “compliance” mentality to a “readiness” mentality, everyone wins.

  • Educators who adopt outcome-based, flexible models will see higher persistence and better alignment with industry needs.
  • Employers who invest in the “escalator” of military talent will build cultures of resilience and loyalty that outperform the competition.
  • Civic Leaders who treat Guard/Reserve education and employment as national infrastructure will ensure that their states remain competitive in an increasingly volatile global economy.

The path forward requires us to integrate, not fragment, the lives of those who serve. By designing systems that recognize the dual-service reality, we don’t just support the military; we build a stronger, more humanized American workforce.

Suggested Abstract:

This research report examines the strategic importance of the 765,000-strong “dual-service workforce” in the National Guard and Reserve. It argues that traditional education and employment systems must move from rigid compliance toward a flexible, “readiness-based” model that utilizes military discipline as a workforce accelerant. By adopting outcome-based learning and family-aware employer policies, America can better integrate these underutilized leaders into the 2026 civilian economy.

Suggested Keywords:

citizen-soldier workforce, Guard and Reserve employment, outcome-based education, small business employers, ESGR, USERRA readiness, Di Tran University research.

Works cited

  1. How many people are in the US military? A demographic overview – USAFacts, accessed January 31, 2026, https://usafacts.org/articles/how-many-people-are-in-the-us-military-a-demographic-overview/
  2. Employment SItuation of Veterans – 2024 – Bureau of Labor Statistics, accessed January 31, 2026, https://www.bls.gov/news.release/pdf/vet.pdf
  3. 54 Small Business Statistics for 2025 – The Kaplan Group, accessed January 31, 2026, https://www.kaplancollectionagency.com/business-advice/54-small-business-statistics-for-2025/
  4. What Are Veterans’ Job Prospects After They Serve? – Census Bureau, accessed January 31, 2026, https://www.census.gov/library/stories/2025/01/veterans-employment-outcomes.html
  5. Veterans to workplace: Keys to successful transition – PMC – PubMed Central, accessed January 31, 2026, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10013406/
  6. Outcome-Based Training and Education – Army University Press, accessed January 31, 2026, https://www.armyupress.army.mil/Journals/NCO-Journal/Archives/2011-and-Prior/Outcome-Based-Training-and-Education/
  7. From military to civilian: Career options with projected fast growth that pay well, accessed January 31, 2026, https://www.bls.gov/careeroutlook/2024/article/military-to-civilian.htm
  8. PILOT STUDY Translating Military Skills to Civilian Employment, accessed January 31, 2026, https://www.dol.gov/agencies/eta/research/publications/pilot-study-translating-military-skills-civilian-employment
  9. Rising National Guard Deployments: What Employers Need to Know, accessed January 31, 2026, https://www.beankinney.com/rising-national-guard-deployments-what-employers-need-to-know/
  10. Employer Support of the Guard and Reserve | The Official Army Benefits Website, accessed January 31, 2026, https://myarmybenefits.us.army.mil/Benefit-Library/Federal-Benefits/Employer-Support-of-the-Guard-and-Reserve-(ESGR)?serv=124
  11. Understanding and Improving Civilian Employer … – RAND, accessed January 31, 2026, https://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/research_reports/RRA800/RRA852-1/RAND_RRA852-1.pdf
  12. Report: RC Employers Supportive, But Challenges Persist, accessed January 31, 2026, https://www.ngaus.org/newsroom/report-rc-employers-supportive-challenges-persist
  13. Spotlight: National Guard and Reserve Families – 2021 Military Family Lifestyle Survey Comprehensive Report, accessed January 31, 2026, https://bluestarfam.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/BSF_MFLS_Results2021_National-Guard-and-Reserve-Families_03_10.pdf
  14. ADVANCING ACCESS AND SUCCESS IN HIGHER EDUCATION FOR MILITARY-CONNECTED LEARNERS, accessed January 31, 2026, https://www.chepp.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/10/CHEPP_MILITARY-CONNECTED-LEARNERS-WHITE-PAPER.pdf
  15. How competency-based education serves the military – Capella University, accessed January 31, 2026, https://www.capella.edu/blog/competency-based-education/how-competency-based-education-serves-the-military/
  16. How Competency and Outcome-Based Learning Drive Success in Higher Education, accessed January 31, 2026, https://ace.edu/blog/how-competency-and-outcome-based-learning-drive-success-in-higher-education/
  17. The Experiential Learning Model (ELM) in the Military – Institute for Defense and Business, accessed January 31, 2026, https://www.idb.org/the-experiential-learning-model-elm-in-the-military/
  18. Outcomes Based Training and Education: in the Department of Military Instruction, United States Military Academy – Pinnacle Leadership, accessed January 31, 2026, https://pinnacle-leaders.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/Outcomes-Based-Training-and-Education_-in-the-Department-of-Military-Instruction-United-States-Military-Academy.pdf
  19. The Humanization of Vocational Education: A Comprehensive …, accessed January 31, 2026, https://louisvillebeautyacademy.net/the-humanization-of-vocational-education-a-comprehensive-research-report-on-the-viability-of-beauty-school-and-the-louisville-beauty-academy-model-research-podcast-series-2026-lba/
  20. Louisville Beauty Academy: Our Direction Forward (2026 and Beyond), accessed January 31, 2026, https://louisvillebeautyacademy.net/louisville-beauty-academy-our-direction-forward-2026-and-beyond/
  21. Author: ditranllc – Louisville Beauty Academy, accessed January 31, 2026, https://louisvillebeautyacademy.net/author/ditran/
  22. Why Louisville Beauty Academy Teaches Beyond Hours — Digital, Public & Research-Backed Proof of Work for Real Careers – Research & Podcast Series 2026, accessed January 31, 2026, https://louisvillebeautyacademy.net/why-louisville-beauty-academy-teaches-beyond-hours-digital-public-research-backed-proof-of-work-for-real-careers-research-podcast-series-2026/
  23. Research Report: Louisville Beauty Academy as a Proven Model for Loan Reform and Workforce Development – 2025, accessed January 31, 2026, https://louisvillebeautyacademy.net/research-report-louisville-beauty-academy-as-a-proven-model-for-loan-reform-and-workforce-development-2025/
  24. An Analysis of the Effect of Reserve Activation on Small Business Research Study – GovInfo, accessed January 31, 2026, https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GOVPUB-SBA-PURL-gpo15928/pdf/GOVPUB-SBA-PURL-gpo15928.pdf
  25. Virginia Air Guard’s Bosslift Event Enhances Military-Civilian Partnerships, accessed January 31, 2026, https://www.ang.af.mil/Media/Article-Display/Article/4301410/virginia-air-guards-bosslift-event-enhances-military-civilian-partnerships/
  26. Know Your Rights | U.S. Department of Labor, accessed January 31, 2026, https://www.dol.gov/agencies/vets/programs/userra/aboutuserra
  27. USERRA | U.S. Department of Labor, accessed January 31, 2026, https://www.dol.gov/agencies/vets/programs/userra/USERRA-Pocket-Guide
  28. What you need to know about the 2025 USERRA & Veteran Employment training requirements – MyCG.uscg.mil, accessed January 31, 2026, https://www.mycg.uscg.mil/News/Article/4137039/what-you-need-to-know-about-the-2025-userra-veteran-employment-training-require/
  29. Employer Resource Guide – ESGR.mil, accessed January 31, 2026, https://www.esgr.mil/Portals/0/Volunteer%20Resources/Fact%20Sheets%20and%20Brochure/Employer%20Resource%20Guide.pdf?ver=2020-07-20-120054-247
  30. Freedom Award Nomination Guidance: How to nominate your employer for this prestigious award! : r/ESGR_USERRA_Answers – Reddit, accessed January 31, 2026, https://www.reddit.com/r/ESGR_USERRA_Answers/comments/1pcmlig/%F0%9D%91%AD%F0%9D%92%93%F0%9D%92%86%F0%9D%92%86%F0%9D%92%85%F0%9D%92%90%F0%9D%92%8E_%F0%9D%91%A8%F0%9D%92%98%F0%9D%92%82%F0%9D%92%93%F0%9D%92%85_%F0%9D%91%B5%F0%9D%92%90%F0%9D%92%8E%F0%9D%92%8A%F0%9D%92%8F%F0%9D%92%82%F0%9D%92%95%F0%9D%92%8A%F0%9D%92%90%F0%9D%92%8F_%F0%9D%91%AE%F0%9D%92%96%F0%9D%92%8A%F0%9D%92%85%F0%9D%92%82%F0%9D%92%8F%F0%9D%92%84%F0%9D%92%86_how_to_nominate/
  31. ESGR Announces 2025 Secretary of Defense Freedom Award Recipients – DVIDS, accessed January 31, 2026, https://www.dvidshub.net/news/542132/esgr-announces-2025-secretary-defense-freedom-award-recipients
  32. ESGR Announces 2025 Secretary of Defense Freedom Award Recipients, accessed January 31, 2026, https://www.esgr.mil/News-Events/Press-Releases/articleType/ArticleView/articleId/10734/ESGR-Announces-2025-Secretary-of-Defense-Freedom-Award-Recipients
  33. Top National Guard employers receive Freedom Award, accessed January 31, 2026, https://www.nationalguard.mil/News/Article-View/Article/1300785/top-national-guard-employers-receive-freedom-award/
  34. GM Financial Honored with 2025 Secretary of Defense Employer Support Freedom Award, accessed January 31, 2026, https://gmfinancial.gcs-web.com/static-files/8f99faa3-42d9-41a4-9d92-43fb87d2b235
  35. GM Financial Receives 2025 Secretary of Defense Employer Support Freedom Award, accessed January 31, 2026, https://www.gmfinancial.com/en-us/company/newsroom/GM-Financial-ESGR-Freedom-Award.html
  36. 2025 Update -Portability of Professional Licenses Flyer – Department of Justice, accessed January 31, 2026, https://www.justice.gov/servicemembers/media/1420991/dl?inline
  37. Servicemembers and Veterans Initiative | 2025 Update: Portability of Professional Licenses, accessed January 31, 2026, https://www.justice.gov/servicemembers/2025-update-portability-professional-licenses
  38. Transferring Your Professional License – Military OneSource, accessed January 31, 2026, https://www.militaryonesource.mil/benefits/transferring-your-professional-license/
  39. Credly Acclaim, accessed January 31, 2026, https://info.credly.com/product/acclaim
  40. Badge Earner Support – Credly, accessed January 31, 2026, https://info.credly.com/badge-earner-support
  41. GM Financial Enhances Benefits for Active-duty Military, Guardsmen and Reservists, accessed January 31, 2026, https://www.gmfinancial.com/en-us/company/newsroom/updated-military-benefits-2025.html
  42. Fostering Resilience in National Guard & Reserve Families: A Contextual Adaptation of an Evidence-based Parenting Program – PubMed Central, accessed January 31, 2026, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5319815/
Copyright 2026 Di Tran University. Design and built and created by Di Tran Enterprise Louisville Institute of Technology
Translate »