Birthright Citizenship in America: From United States v. Wong Kim Ark to Modern Demographic Reality — A Constitutional, Historical, and Societal Analysis - RESEARCH & PODCAST SERIES 2026

The question of birthright citizenship remains one of the most significant and debated aspects of the American constitutional framework. It serves as the legal mechanism by which the United States defines the boundaries of its national community, ensuring that the accident of birth on domestic soil confers the full rights and responsibilities of citizenship.¹ This principle, known as jus soli (right of the soil), stands in contrast to jus sanguinis (right of blood), which determines citizenship based on parental lineage.¹ While the historical foundation of this right was firmly established through the 1898 Supreme Court case United States v. Wong Kim Ark, involving a Chinese-American, the modern demographic reality presents a vastly different landscape.¹ Today, the population most directly impacted by birthright citizenship is predominantly Latino, creating a notable divergence between the legal genesis of the right and its contemporary application.⁴ This analysis explores the constitutional evolution of birthright citizenship, the statistical shifts in impacted populations, and the enduring contributions of immigrant communities, with a specific focus on the disciplined, service-oriented contributions of Asian and Vietnamese Americans to the national fabric.

Constitutional Foundation — Wong Kim Ark and the 14th Amendment

The legal cornerstone of birthright citizenship is the Citizenship Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, ratified in 1868 in the immediate aftermath of the American Civil War.² The primary objective of the amendment was to overturn the 1857 Dred Scott v. Sandford decision, which had infamously declared that individuals of African descent could not be citizens of the United States.⁵ By stating that “all persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States,” the amendment sought to provide a definitive and inclusive definition of citizenship that prioritized birthplace over race or previous condition of servitude.⁶

The phrase “subject to the jurisdiction thereof” has historically served as the primary point of contention in interpreting the scope of this clause.⁶ During the congressional debates of 1866, Senator Lyman Trumbull, a key architect of the Civil Rights Act, suggested that “jurisdiction” implied more than mere physical presence; it required a person to not owe allegiance to any foreign power.⁹ However, the subsequent judicial interpretation moved toward a territorial understanding of jurisdiction, emphasizing that anyone present within the United States—and thus required to obey its laws—fell under its jurisdiction.¹ This interpretation was crucial for a nation that sought to integrate millions of formerly enslaved people and their descendants into the body politic.⁶

The Landmark Case: United States v. Wong Kim Ark (1898)

The practical application of the Fourteenth Amendment to the children of immigrants was tested in the seminal case of United States v. Wong Kim Ark.¹ Wong Kim Ark was born in San Francisco in 1873 to Chinese parents who were permanent residents and business owners in the city.¹⁰ At the time, the Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882 prohibited Chinese immigrants from naturalizing, creating a complex legal environment for their U.S.-born children.¹¹ Upon returning from a visit to China at age 21, Wong was denied re-entry into the United States on the grounds that he was not a citizen.¹

The government’s primary argument was that Wong remained a subject of the Emperor of China because his parents were Chinese subjects, effectively advocating for the principle of jus sanguinis.¹⁰ The solicitor general at the time questioned whether Chinese children born in the country should share the “exalted qualification” of citizenship with the descendants of the American Revolution.⁶ This xenophobic framing reflected the widespread anti-Chinese sentiment of the era.¹ However, the Supreme Court, in a 6–2 decision authored by Justice Horace Gray, ruled in favor of Wong.¹

The Court established that the Fourteenth Amendment applied to nearly everyone born on American soil, regardless of their parents’ nationality, provided they were not children of foreign diplomats or invading forces.⁵ The ruling affirmed that the common law of England, which recognized jus soli, had been incorporated into American constitutional law.¹² This decision was significant as it underscored the United States’ commitment to the idea that anyone born on American soil is entitled to citizenship, regardless of their parents’ immigration status.¹

Theoretical Discord: Jurisdiction and Allegiance

Despite the clarity of the Wong Kim Ark ruling, theoretical debates persist regarding the distinction between “territorial jurisdiction” and “political jurisdiction”.⁹ Some legal scholars argue that the 14th Amendment was intended to exclude children of those who owe a “direct and immediate allegiance” to a foreign nation.¹² They point to the Slaughter-House Cases (1872) and Elk v. Wilkins (1884), where the Court suggested that the jurisdiction clause was intended to exclude children of foreign ministers, consuls, and citizens of foreign states.⁹

Case Name	Year	Primary Legal Finding	Impact on Birthright Citizenship
Dred Scott v. Sandford	1857	African descendants cannot be citizens.	Prompted the creation of the 14th Amendment.
Slaughter-House Cases	1872	Distinguished between state and national citizenship.	Provided early (narrow) commentary on jurisdiction.
Elk v. Wilkins	1884	Native Americans not citizens under the 14th Amendment.	Clarified that “jurisdiction” required more than presence.
United States v. Wong Kim Ark	1898	Children of permanent residents are citizens at birth.	Enshrined jus soli as the prevailing national standard.

The Elk v. Wilkins decision is particularly notable because it held that Native Americans, who owed primary allegiance to their tribes, were not “subject to the jurisdiction” of the United States in the constitutional sense.⁹ This necessitated the Indian Citizenship Act of 1924 to grant them citizenship.¹³ Critics of broad birthright citizenship use this as evidence that the 14th Amendment does not automatically cover everyone born within U.S. borders.⁹ However, the weight of modern jurisprudence and over a century of executive practice has consistently favored the territorial interpretation established in Wong Kim Ark.⁵

Modern Demographic Reality — Who is Impacted Today

While a Chinese-American provided the legal catalyst for birthright citizenship, the demographic groups most reliant on this principle have shifted significantly over time.¹ In the late 19th century, the legal battle centered on Asian immigrants; today, it centers largely on Latino and, to a lesser extent, African and other Asian populations.⁴ As of mid-2025, approximately 51.9 million immigrants reside in the United States, representing 15.4% of the total population.¹⁴ This population is heterogeneous, but specific subgroups are more likely to have children who acquire citizenship through jus soli due to their legal status or length of residency.⁴

Statistical Distribution of Births

The “modern demographic reality” is characterized by a significant concentration of births to non-citizen parents within the Latino community.⁴ In 2023, mothers who were unauthorized immigrants or had legal temporary status (such as student or guest worker visas) had approximately 320,000 babies.³ These births accounted for roughly 9% of all 3.6 million babies born in the United States that year.³

Origin Region	Share of Births to Non-Citizen Parents (Est.)	Socioeconomic and Policy Implications
Latin America	70% – 75%	High impact on education and healthcare systems in Southwest and Florida.
Asia	15% – 20%	Significant contribution to technical sectors; higher naturalization rates.
Africa	5% – 8%	Fastest growing immigrant segment; diverse humanitarian and work pathways.
Other (Europe/Canada)	< 5%	Generally high-skill professional visas; lower birth rates among temporary residents.

Data from 2022 indicates that 75% of all children under 18 living with non-citizen parents were Latino, totaling roughly 4 million children.⁴ Within this group, about 1.06 million citizen children aged 0 to 3 had exclusively non-citizen parents.⁴ This statistical concentration underscores that while the legal foundation of birthright citizenship remains constitutionally neutral and historically tied to Asian immigrants, its modern application is a cornerstone of the Latino-American experience.⁴

Trends in Unauthorized Immigration and Births

It is essential for public understanding to recognize that the number of births to unauthorized immigrant mothers has been on a downward trend for nearly two decades.³ These births peaked in 2006 at approximately 380,000, representing 9% of all U.S. births that year.³ By 2019, the annual number of births to unauthorized immigrant mothers had dropped by more than 40% to 215,000.³ While there was a slight uptick to 300,000 by 2023, the overall trend reflects a maturing and slowly declining unauthorized population.³

Year	Births to Unauthorized Mothers	% of Total U.S. Births	Contextual Factor
1990	120,000	3%	Beginning of significant unauthorized growth.
2006	380,000	9%	Historic peak in unauthorized migration.
2019	215,000	~6%	Pre-pandemic slowdown and policy shifts.
2023	300,000	~8.3%	Post-pandemic recovery and shifting migration routes.

As of June 2025, approximately one in four children in the United States has at least one immigrant parent, and the vast majority of these children are U.S.-born citizens.¹⁵ This highlights that birthright citizenship is not a “transient” issue but a foundational component of American population growth and workforce stability.¹⁸ Immigrants and their U.S.-born children have accounted for the entire growth of the prime working-age population in the United States since 2000.¹⁸

The Gap — Law vs. Perception vs. Media

There is a profound dissonance between the legal mechanics of birthright citizenship and how it is perceived by the American public.²⁰ This “gap” is often exacerbated by media narratives that fail to distinguish between historical precedent and contemporary statistics.²² The concept that “narrative representation is not demographic representation” is critical for a nuanced understanding of this issue.²⁰

Narrative Storytelling vs. Statistical Reality

Media coverage of birthright citizenship often centers on individual figures, such as civil rights attorneys or “exceptional” immigrant cases, to humanize legal debates.¹² These figures appear in the media because they provide a compelling narrative framework for discussing constitutional rights.²⁰ For example, the frequent citation of Wong Kim Ark in the news creates a narrative where Asian-American history is the intellectual face of the law.¹

However, this narrative representation can mask the demographic reality that the Latino population is the group most affected by potential changes to the law.⁴ When the media focuses on “birth tourism” by wealthy individuals from China or Eastern Europe—a phenomenon that is statistically small, involving roughly 9,000 births to foreign residents in 2023—it can distort the public’s perception of who birthright citizenship serves.³ In reality, birthright citizenship primarily impacts working-class families who have been residents for years.³

Audience Projection and Visual Bias

Research indicates that perceived bias in immigration reporting is not merely a product of the media’s framing but also a reflection of how audiences project their ideological filters onto visual narratives.²¹ In a study of over 2,000 images from media outlets on X (formerly Twitter), it was found that partisan audiences assign identity-driven interpretations to identical visuals.²¹ For example, an image of a newborn in a hospital might be viewed as a “blessing of citizenship” by one group and as a “policy loophole” by another, regardless of the accompanying text.²¹

Analysis Level	Media/Perception Dynamic	Policy/Legal Reality
Narrative	Focused on “Wong Kim Ark” or “exceptional” cases.	Foundationally rooted in jus soli for all.
Demographic	Often hidden; focused on border imagery.	75% of impacted children are Latino.
Sentiment	Highly polarized; focuses on “scams” or “threats.”	Immigrants provide a $14.5T fiscal surplus (1994-2023).
Education Gap	Public split 50/50 on 14th Amendment rights.	Clear SCOTUS precedent for 125+ years.

The public’s split on birthright citizenship—with 50% favoring and 49% opposing it for children of unauthorized immigrants—suggests an education gap regarding the 14th Amendment’s history and purpose.²⁴ While 94-95% of adults agree that children of legal immigrants and U.S.-born parents should be citizens, the skepticism toward the unauthorized population reflects a belief that the law is being “exploited”.¹² Addressing this gap requires shifting the focus from divisive rhetoric to empirical data and the shared value of national contribution.²⁵

Asian-American & Vietnamese Contribution to America

Asian and Vietnamese Americans occupy a unique and humble position in the American tapestry.²⁷ As a community, they demonstrate that contribution is not always loud or disruptive; it is often the result of quiet, consistent discipline and a commitment to the structures that make a society thrive.²⁸ This “contribution without noise” has allowed the community to have an impact far beyond its population size.²⁷

Values: Discipline, Hard Work, and Compliance

The Vietnamese-American experience, largely born out of the refugee crises of the 1970s, is anchored in a set of core values that prioritize resilience and gratitude.²⁷ Arriving with minimal resources, many Vietnamese families relied on multi-generational households and a shared work ethic to build a foundation in the United States.³¹

Hard Work and Education: Both Vietnamese and American cultures share a high value for education as a path to upward social mobility.²⁹ Vietnamese students are often expected to put in long hours of study, reflecting a deep respect for teachers and authority figures.²⁹
Compliance with the Law: Vietnamese immigrants who arrived as refugees often carry a profound sense of loyalty to the United States for providing them with safety.³⁰ This gratitude manifests as a high level of compliance with legal and regulatory systems and a desire to contribute positively to the national fabric.³³
Family Structure: The importance of the family unit is a central tenet of Vietnamese culture.³¹ Multi-generational living arrangements not only provide emotional support but also create an informal economic safety net that fosters entrepreneurship and homeownership.²⁷

Entrepreneurship and Affordability

The entrepreneurial streak in the Asian-American community is not just about wealth creation; it is about service and accessibility.²⁷ The Vietnamese-American community, in particular, has mastered the “humanization” of essential services.³⁶

Sector	Contribution Detail	Humanization Aspect
Personal Care	76% of Texas nail industry is Vietnamese.	High-touch service resistant to AI automation.
Food & Hospitality	1 in 5 employer businesses in Food Services are Asian-owned.	Cultural exchange through affordable community markets.
Small Business	310,000 Vietnamese-owned firms nationwide.	Pathway from refugee survival to community ownership.
Tech & STEM	Asian Americans hold 13% of STEM jobs and 19% of patents.	Quietly driving the “physics of progress” and innovation.

The Vietnamese American Business Association (VABA) estimates that the community’s 310,000 businesses generate $35 billion in annual revenue.²⁷ These businesses range from local nail salons and restaurants to high-growth tech startups.²⁷ A key element of their success is the focus on affordability and service to the community, ensuring that high-quality care and products remain accessible to the average American.²⁷ This model reflects the Di Tran University philosophy: that progress is made through doing, and that potential expands when knowledge is used as a tool for service.²⁸

A Quiet but Foundational Contributor

The Asian-American community is often overrepresented in sectors that are critical to the future of the American economy, yet they remain a “quiet” contributor.²⁷ While accounting for only 6% of the population, Asian Americans have driven 22% of employment growth in recent years.³⁸ Their contribution to private sector output growth between 2003 and 2019 reached $1.5 trillion in current dollar terms.³⁸

This impact is achieved through “discipline as a cultural strength”.²⁷ By focusing on professional awareness, ethical boundaries, and consistent effort, Asian and Vietnamese Americans reinforce the values of a stable and prosperous nation.³³ They do not demand recognition; rather, they seek to strengthen the systems they operate within, proving that a dedicated minority can be a foundational pillar of the American fabric.²⁷

Economic Contribution & Workforce Impact

The debate surrounding birthright citizenship often fails to account for the comprehensive economic impact of immigrants and their U.S.-born descendants.¹⁹ Immigrant workers are not merely a supplemental labor force; they are integral to the fiscal health and innovation capacity of the United States.¹⁹

Fiscal Impact and Public Systems

Empirical evidence consistently indicates that immigrants have historically contributed more in tax revenue than they receive in public benefits.¹⁹ A 2025 study examining data from 1994 to 2023 found that immigrants across all levels of government paid more in taxes than they received in benefits, resulting in a cumulative fiscal surplus of $14.5 trillion (in real 2024 dollars).¹⁹

Fiscal Category	Impact of Immigrant Population (1994-2023)	Long-Term Significance
Cumulative Surplus	$14.5 Trillion (Real 2024 USD)	Offsets interest payments on the national debt.
Medicare/Medicaid	$63.2 Billion Net Surplus (2017)	Offsets the deficit created by U.S.-born citizens.
Social Security	Supports long-run actuarial deficit by 25%.	Essential for maintaining benefits for an aging population.
Total GDP Share	Immigrants drive roughly 10-15% of short-run GDP.	Fundamental to national economic competitiveness.

This fiscal boon is particularly evident in the healthcare sector. In 2017, immigrants generated a net surplus of $63.2 billion in payments to Medicare, Medicaid, and private insurers.⁴ This surplus helped offset the $72.2 billion deficit created by U.S.-born citizens, whose healthcare costs frequently exceed their contributions.⁴ Furthermore, the 2025 Social Security Trustees Report suggests that reducing net migration by half would worsen the long-run actuarial deficit of the program by 25% over the next 75 years.¹⁹

Entrepreneurship and Innovation

Immigrants are a primary driver of entrepreneurial energy in the United States.⁴⁰ They represent a high share of workers at both the high-skill and low-skill ends of the spectrum.⁴⁰ U.S.-based immigrants account for only 16% of the inventor workforce but are responsible for 23% of all patents and 32% of total U.S. innovative output since 1990.⁴⁰

Entrepreneurial Density: Small businesses exceed 36.2 million in 2025, and racial minorities own roughly 22% of these firms.⁴¹ AANHPI entrepreneurs are behind some of the world’s most successful startups, including LinkedIn, YouTube, and Zoom.⁴²
Workforce Participation: In low-wage sectors where U.S. citizens often prefer not to work, such as agriculture (43% immigrant) and construction (28% immigrant), foreign-born workers help relieve labor shortages and contain inflation.⁴⁰
Economic Resilience: During the COVID-19 pandemic and subsequent recovery, the resilience of minority-owned small businesses—such as Vietnamese-owned nail salons and restaurants—sustained local economies through innovative pivots and community-centered service.²⁷

The AI-Proof Sanctuary of Human Service

One of the most profound insights emerging from the Di Tran University research team is the “AI-proof” nature of human services.³⁶ As artificial intelligence masters the abstraction of data, the value of work shifts toward the “humanization of service”—professions that require human judgment, empathy, and fine motor skills.³⁶

The beauty industry, heavily populated by Vietnamese-American entrepreneurs, serves as the applied institutional model for this concept.³⁶ A beauty license is not just a job application; it is a “declaration of independence” and a pathway to first-access ownership.³⁶ By pairing licensed education with operational discipline, the immigrant community has created a scalable engine for economic participation that cannot be replicated by machines.³⁶ This focuses on the “Physics of Touch” and “Empathy,” proving that human connection is the most valuable commodity in an AI-driven world.³⁶

Policy Understanding & Public Education Gap

The chasm between academic legal theory and the general public’s understanding of citizenship law is a significant hurdle to national unity.¹² Public education initiatives, such as the Research & Podcast Series 2026, are necessary to provide an evidence-based foundation for discussing these issues without divisiveness.²⁵

The “Chilling Effect” of Policy Uncertainty

The political debate over birthright citizenship does not just happen in courthouses; it has real-world consequences for the health and well-being of American communities.⁴ Restrictive rhetoric creates a “chilling effect,” where families avoid essential services for fear of jeopardizing their immigration status.⁴

Health/Social Metric	Impact of Immigration-Related Worries (2025)	Demographic Specifics
Safety Net Avoidance	46% of likely undocumented adults avoided programs.	Up from 27% in 2023.
Child Well-being	18% of immigrant parents report behavioral changes.	Includes sleep, school performance issues.
Uninsured Rate	46% for likely undocumented; 21% for lawfully present.	Significant disparity compared to naturalized citizens (7%).
Prenatal Care Costs	$3,200 additional cost per newborn without care.	Leads to higher postnatal and pediatric costs.

In California alone, over 130,000 Latino children potentially lost access to their usual source of healthcare because their caretakers avoided public health programs due to immigration concerns.⁴ This avoidance is not just a personal crisis; it is a public health concern that drives up costs for the entire system through emergency room visits and delayed treatments.⁴

Redefining Education Beyond Credentials

To counter the misinformation and “shame” sometimes associated with vocational trades, Di Tran University (DTU) emphasizes a “Triadic Learning Architecture”.³⁶ This model bridges the gap between the College of AI, the College of Human Services, and the College of Humanization.³⁶

The “Yes I Can” Methodology: This pedagogy dismantles psychological barriers by rewarding action and completion over theoretical abstraction.³⁶ It views a professional license as a “humanized record of action” rather than just a status symbol.³⁶
Compliance-by-Design: Education at institutions like Louisville Beauty Academy places students before profit and compliance before confusion.²⁵ This ensures that graduates are not only skilled but also literate in the law, safety, and ethics of their profession.²⁵
Public Knowledge Infrastructure: LBA and DTU function as public libraries for the industry, sharing research and information to elevate the entire profession.²⁵ This transparency reduces misinformation and empowers individuals to make informed business decisions.²⁵

By educating the public on the real-world outcomes of disciplined labor and legal compliance, these institutions strengthen the credibility of the American system.²⁸ They teach that “awareness does not equal action beyond scope,” a critical lesson in maintaining professional and civic boundaries.³⁹

Conclusion — Unity, Contribution, and Constitutional Integrity

The history of birthright citizenship in the United States is a narrative of expansion and inclusion, rooted in the hard-won legal victories of those who came before.¹ While the modern debate often focuses on the numerical impact on specific demographics, the principle remains a constant: a commitment to the idea that being American is defined by where one is born and what one contributes, rather than one’s lineage.⁶

The Vietnamese and Asian-American experience provides a model for how immigrant communities can integrate with discipline and humility.²⁷ By focusing on “contribution over recognition,” these groups have built a standard of excellence that strengthens the national economy and enriches the cultural landscape.²⁷ Whether through the “AI-proof” sanctuary of the beauty industry or the high-impact innovation of the STEM workforce, their dedication proves that citizenship is a platform for service.³⁶

The distinction between the legal foundation of birthright citizenship (Wong Kim Ark) and its modern demographic impact (Latino) must be understood not as a conflict, but as a testament to the law’s neutrality and endurance.¹ Just as Wong Kim Ark quietly but firmly asserted his right to belong, millions of Americans today do the same through daily labor, small business ownership, and civic participation.¹

Moving forward, the national conversation must bridge the gap between legal theory and statistical reality.²¹ It requires a commitment to humanization—recognizing the dignity of every individual who contributes quietly and consistently to the American project.³⁶ By upholding the integrity of the Fourteenth Amendment and honoring the diverse paths of those who call America home, the United States preserves its unique identity as a land of opportunity for all.⁷

“Birthright citizenship is not owned by any one group. It is a constitutional principle shaped by history, carried by immigrants, and sustained by those who contribute daily—quietly, consistently, and with purpose—to the United States of America.”

This publication is part of the Di Tran University – College of Humanization Research & Podcast Series 2026 and is intended for educational and research purposes only. It does not constitute legal advice. Louisville Beauty Academy shares this content for public awareness and does not interpret or enforce law.

Works cited

United States vs. Wong Kim Ark | Law | Research Starters – EBSCO, accessed April 1, 2026, https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/law/united-states-vs-wong-kim-ark
United States v. Wong Kim Ark (1898) – The National Constitution Center, accessed April 1, 2026, https://constitutioncenter.org/the-constitution/supreme-court-case-library/united-states-v-wong-kim-ark-1898
About 9% of U.S. births in 2023 were to unauthorized or temporary …, accessed April 1, 2026, https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2026/03/31/about-9-of-us-births-in-2023-were-to-unauthorized-or-temporary-legal-immigrant-mothers/
Born into Uncertainty | Latino Policy & Politics Institute, accessed April 1, 2026, https://latino.ucla.edu/research/ending-birthright-citizenship/
Trump expected to attend supreme court arguments on landmark birthright citizenship case – US politics live, accessed April 1, 2026, https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/live/2026/apr/01/donald-trump-supreme-court-birthright-citizenship-case-us-politics-latest-news-updates
Trump officials cite white supremacists in bid to end birthright citizenship, accessed April 1, 2026, https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2026/03/30/trump-birthright-citizenship-supreme-court-case/
Supreme Court hears fight over Trump’s bid to limit birthright citizenship, and he plans to be there, accessed April 1, 2026, https://apnews.com/article/supreme-court-trump-birthright-citizenship-immigrants-4dca3a4e06f58d4378412ed711fab3a8
The birthright citizenship case at the Supreme Court hits close to home for this immigrant mother, accessed April 1, 2026, https://apnews.com/article/supreme-court-birthright-citizenship-trump-immigration-constitution-e51d13b21b4240f6b8625700abe6030e
Birthright Citizenship: A Fundamental Misunderstanding of the 14th …, accessed April 1, 2026, https://www.heritage.org/immigration/commentary/birthright-citizenship-fundamental-misunderstanding-the-14th-amendment
United States v. Wong Kim Ark | 169 U.S. 649 (1898) – Justia Supreme Court Center, accessed April 1, 2026, https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/169/649/
United States v. Wong Kim Ark – Oyez, accessed April 1, 2026, https://www.oyez.org/cases/1850-1900/169us649
Birthright citizenship faces first Supreme Court test in more than 100 years, accessed April 1, 2026, https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/supreme-court/4509805/birthright-citizenship-first-supreme-court-test-100-years/
Birthright Citizenship Isn’t Real – Mises Institute, accessed April 1, 2026, https://mises.org/power-market/birthright-citizenship-isnt-real
Key findings about U.S. immigrants – Pew Research Center, accessed April 1, 2026, https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2025/08/21/key-findings-about-us-immigrants/
KFF/New York Times 2025 Survey of Immigrants: Health and Health Care Experiences During the Second Trump Administration, accessed April 1, 2026, https://www.kff.org/immigrant-health/kff-new-york-times-2025-survey-of-immigrants-health-and-health-care-experiences-during-the-second-trump-administration/
Immigration & Migration – Research and data from Pew Research Center, accessed April 1, 2026, https://www.pewresearch.org/topic/immigration-migration/
U.S. Unauthorized Immigrant Population Reached a Record 14 Million in 2023 – Pew Research Center, accessed April 1, 2026, https://www.pewresearch.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/20/2025/08/RE_2025.08.21_Unauthorized-Immigrants_REPORT.pdf
Frequently Requested Statistics on Immigrants and Immigration in the United States, accessed April 1, 2026, https://www.migrationpolicy.org/article/frequently-requested-statistics-immigrants-and-immigration-united-states
The impact of immigrants on the US economy – Brookings Institution, accessed April 1, 2026, https://www.brookings.edu/articles/the-impact-of-immigrants-on-the-us-economy/
The “Problem” of Human Label Variation: On Ground Truth in Data, Modeling and Evaluation | Request PDF – ResearchGate, accessed April 1, 2026, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/372931632_The_Problem_of_Human_Label_Variation_On_Ground_Truth_in_Data_Modeling_and_Evaluation
Media choice and audience perceptions: Evidence from visual …, accessed April 1, 2026, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12435698/
The role of media narratives in shaping public opinion toward refugees: A comparative analysis, accessed April 1, 2026, https://publications.iom.int/system/files/pdf/MRS-72.pdf
Analyzing the Media’s Representation of Refugees and Asylum Seekers in the UK: A Frame Analysis of The Guardian and The Times – USF Scholarship Repository – University of San Francisco, accessed April 1, 2026, https://repository.usfca.edu/thes/1355/
U.S. public is split on birthright citizenship for people whose parents immigrated illegally, accessed April 1, 2026, https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2025/06/10/us-public-is-split-on-birthright-citizenship-for-people-whose-parents-immigrated-illegally/
Louisville Beauty Academy: Our Direction Forward (2026 and Beyond), accessed April 1, 2026, https://louisvillebeautyacademy.net/louisville-beauty-academy-our-direction-forward-2026-and-beyond/
STAATUS Index 2025 – The Asian American Foundation – TAAF, accessed April 1, 2026, https://www.taaf.org/our-work/staatus-index-2025
Vietnamese Americans and Their Contributions to the U.S. Economy …, accessed April 1, 2026, https://vietbaolouisville.com/2025/09/vietnamese-americans-and-their-contributions-to-the-u-s-economy-research-september-2025/
Di Tran — Founder & CEO | Visionary Leader in Workforce Education, Humanized AI, and Immigrant Entrepreneurship – New American Business Association (NABA) – Louisville, KY, accessed April 1, 2026, https://naba4u.org/di-tran-founder-ceo-visionary-leader-in-workforce-education-humanized-ai-and-immigrant-entrepreneurship/
Differences and Similarities between Vietnamese and American culture in Learning, accessed April 1, 2026, https://www.unishanoi.org/about/calendar-news-and-publications/post-default/~board/news/post/similarities-between-vietnamese-and-american-culture
Vietnamese Americans | History | Research Starters – EBSCO, accessed April 1, 2026, https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/history/vietnamese-americans
Vietnamese – Cultural Awareness Project, accessed April 1, 2026, https://www.sdcda.org/office/cultural-awareness/communities/vietnamese
Journey of Integration: The Development of the Vietnamese-American Culture in Modern-Day America | by Ann Truong | Medium, accessed April 1, 2026, https://medium.com/@anntruong/journey-of-integration-the-development-of-the-vietnamese-american-culture-in-modern-day-america-1fc1c38e0aa3
Lessons Learned from Working in Vietnam – Forbes Books, accessed April 1, 2026, https://books.forbes.com/author-articles/lessons-learned-from-working-in-vietnam/
Vietnamese Americans – Learning for Justice, accessed April 1, 2026, https://www.learningforjustice.org/sites/default/files/kits/vac_brief_history.pdf
Differences Between American and Vietnamese Cultures – Essay Examples – PapersOwl, accessed April 1, 2026, https://hub.papersowl.com/examples/differences-between-american-and-vietnamese-cultures/
education beyond credentials Archives – Louisville Beauty Academy …, accessed April 1, 2026, https://louisvillebeautyacademy.net/tag/education-beyond-credentials/
Humanization in Beauty Education: Elevating Trends Through Purposeful Training at Louisville Beauty Academy, accessed April 1, 2026, https://louisvillebeautyacademy.net/humanization-in-beauty-education-elevating-trends-through-purposeful-training-at-louisville-beauty-academy/
The Bigger Picture Asianomics in America Contributions and Challenges – Goldman Sachs, accessed April 1, 2026, https://www.goldmansachs.com/pdfs/insights/pages/gs-research/asianomics-in-america/report.pdf
Di Tran University research partnership Archives – Louisville Beauty Academy, accessed April 1, 2026, https://louisvillebeautyacademy.net/tag/di-tran-university-research-partnership/
How Tighter Curbs on Immigration Impact the U.S. Economy – Econofact, accessed April 1, 2026, https://econofact.org/how-tighter-curbs-on-immigration-impact-the-u-s-economy
20+ Small Business Statistics in the U.S. (2024-25), accessed April 1, 2026, https://high5test.com/small-business-statistics/
Breaking Down Funding Barriers for Asian American and Pacific Islander Entrepreneurs, accessed April 1, 2026, https://www.bcg.com/publications/2023/breaking-down-funding-barriers-for-aapi-owned-businesses
AI, Productivity, and Labor Markets: A Review of the Empirical Evidence, accessed April 1, 2026, https://laweconcenter.org/resources/ai-productivity-and-labor-markets-a-review-of-the-empirical-evidence/